We continue on our discussion surrounding the Federal Harmonisation of Safety Legislation in Australia.

I recently read an article written by the National Research Centre for OHS Regulation, which I wish to discuss here. The full article can be found here

The National Research Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Regulation (NRCOHSR) is a research centre within the Regulatory Institutions Network, in the School of Regulation, Justice and Diplomacy, at The Australian National University.

One area of interest is the discussion surrounding contract, sub-contract, home-based arrangements and other “outside the box” type of engagements. The Centre stated:

“A second noteworthy point is the need for OHS regulators to pay greater attention to work relationships outside the traditional employment relationship. With the dramatic changes that are taking place in the Australian labour market, mirroring changes taking place elsewhere in the world, regulators need to develop standards, guidance material, inspection programs and enforcement strategies that accommodate subcontracting, labour hire, home-based work and franchise arrangements.”

I was interested to note that the Centre went on to discuss the election of sub-contractors to positions of Safety Representatives, removing the past norm of Representatives being sourced from the employee pool. I would be concerned of the shifting of Representatives from employees (who have certain inalienable employee rights under legislation) to subcontractors who are reliant on the organisation to renew contracts or to engage them in future services.

Another item discussed by the Centre was past Australian legislation omitting the promotion of “multi-disciplinary occupational health services by employers”. The Centre goes on to discuss the Queensland model of Workplace Health and Safety Model and promotes this model as an example of positive format:

“The most successful provision appears to be the Queensland provision requiring an employer to appoint a workplace health and safety officer when there are 30 or more workers normally employed at a prescribed workplace;…”

Safety & Security Australia has consulted and audited in all States of Australia and we have concerns that the proposed national legislation in its current format, removes the role of Workplace Health and Safety Officer. It does seem incongruous to us that a model held as example of positive safety management as identified by the NRCOHSR, is to be removed by the harmonisation legislation.

It may also be a concern that the changes could lead to Safety Representatives being sourced from sub-contract positions which could be more prone to pressure of contract renewal or any other perceived influences.

Advertisement